Home General Documents Institutional Report Conceptual Framework
Exhibit Room Louisiana St. Supp. Rep. SPA Reports  

 

EXHIBIT 5e.1

Educational Leadership and Technology Department

Faculty Evaluation Procedures 2006-2007 

A faculty member will be considered “Inadequate” if he/she does not meet or exceed the minimum standards of the Adequate category as set forth in the Tenure, Promotion and Annual review guidelines established for ELT tenure-track or in the instructor positions.  

I. Teaching/Job Effectiveness (45 points)

A.                                                            B.

SOT rating 15 points                Evaluations (30 points) 

6.0 - 5.6 = 15          100%      Self (15 points):    Dept Head (15 points):

5.5 - 5.3 = 14          93%         10 = 15                      10 = 15

5.2 - 5.1 = 13           87%          9 = 14                         9 = 14

5.0 - 4.9 = 12          80%          Narrative +  8 = 13       8 = 13

4.8 - 4.7 = 11          73%           7 = 12                         7 = 12 + Narrative

4.6 - 4.5 = 10          66%           6 = 11                         6 = 11

4.4 - 4.3 = 9            53%           5 = 10                          5 = 10

4.2 - 4.1 = 6            40%

4.0  - 4     = 4          27%

3.0 - 3.9 = 3            20%

 
(Enrichment of professional preparation & teaching, development of course-related materials and other instruction-related activities should be included as   factors contributing to Teaching/Job Effectiveness scores and point totals) 

C. MENTORING (optional 1-5 points) 

While the University has recognized mentoring as an essential component of its teaching mission, it recognizes that not all faculty will be mentors. Consequently, the points that are awarded for these activities must be based on the nature and extent of the activities and agreed upon by the faculty member and department head. 

Mentoring occurs when faculty work with students inside or outside of their classes in such a way that they draw upon their advanced discipline‑specific knowledge and involves a greater commitment than the advising that occurs in the regular course of teaching. Examples of mentoring activities include directing students on research projects, helping students understand various options and opportunities available in furthering their education, writing letters of recommendation, etc.

 If you believe that you have worked with students in a mentoring capacity, the nature and extent of these activities should be addressed in your narrative. 

II. Professional Activity 35 points (When sliding scale is provided, it is the faculty member’s responsibility to justify higher score.)

A. Scholarly Activity/Research

1. Publications

Book or monograph                                           20-30

Book edited                                                        8-10

Book Chapter                                                     6-10

Other:

(i.e. Manual, Workbook)                          3 - 5

 

2. Editorial Work/ Reviewing

 Journal edited                                                           5

 Newsletter edited                                                     2

 Review:

book, conference paper or typescript             3

Other                                                                   2-4

 

3. Grant Proposal Writing/Research (University Related)

Grant Proposals (funded)                                      4 - 6

(principal investigator) 

4. Articles                                                                                

Journal article                                                    6 - 10 

5. Presentations                                                

Presentation                                                      3 - 5   

Session chair/discussant                                      2 

B. Professional Service                                 

 Professional Organizations       

Officer in Prof. Org./Board                               4 - 6

Committee chair                                               2 - 4

Member prof org. (up to 3)                               1         

Other                                                              2 - 5 

III. SERVICE (10 points) 

A. University

1. Committee chair                                                       3

2. Committee member                                                  1

3. Student organization sponsored                                  1         

4. Faculty senate officer                                               3                                                         

5. Faculty senate member                                             1 

C. College/department

1. Workshop sponsored/coordinated                              3

2. Committee chaired                                                   2                     

3. Committee member                                                  1 

D. Community (Related to University Role)                                                            

1. Community or school advisory board member            1         

2. Speech to community organization (non-prof)            1         

3. Other                                                                    1-3

EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND TECHNOLOGY

FACULTY EVALUATION

2006-2007 

SCORE SHEET 

I.       TEACHING/JOB EFFECTIVENESS (45 POINTS)
 

Student opinion of teaching mean    _____      # of Points out of 15        ______

Self Evaluation Score (1-10)           _____     # of Points out of 15         ______

Department Head Score (1-10)       _____    # of Points out of 15         ______ 

Mentoring
 

Teaching/Job Effectiveness Total out of 45 Points                 ______
 

( _____ Flex Points Figured for Category Total )                  _____

II.        PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITY (35 POINTS)

Scholarly Activity Points          ______

Professional Service Points       ______
 

(_____ Flex Points Figured for Category Total)                   _____

III.           SERVICE (10 POINTS)

             Service Total out of 10 points      ______
 

(_____ Flex Points Figured for Category Total)                   _____


Score for Total Evaluation out of 100 points (Total Last Column)            
_____Excellent   ____  Distinction   _____  Adequate   ____  Inadequate
 
_____________________                          ______________________
Faculty Signature and Date                           Department Head Signature and Date

 

  

 


Southeastern Louisiana University
© 2007 Southeastern Louisiana University
All Rights Reserved
Unofficial and external sites are not endorsed by Southeastern Louisiana University