Home General Documents Institutional Report Conceptual Framework
Exhibit Room Louisiana St. Supp. Rep. SPA Reports  

 

EXHIBIT 5b.6

Scores on Selected Exit Survey Items 

Items:

  1. Effectiveness of the faculty as teachers
  1. Quality of instruction in advanced courses
  1. Opportunity for meaningful interaction with faculty in research or other scholarly activity
  1. Quality of instruction regarding standards and ethics in your major field
  1. Use of appropriate technology in the classroom
  1. “Real-world” experiences, exposure, examples, etc., in or out of the classroom

Scale:       1= Very Dissatisfied …………….5= Very Satisfied 

Department of Educational Leadership, 2004-2005

Degree

 

1

2

3

4

5

Item 3. Effectiveness of the faculty as teachers

ME Admin/Sup Supervision

0.0%

2.2%

8.7%

39.1%

50.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 7. Quality of instruction in advanced courses

M E Admin & Supervision

0.0%

0.0%

8.7%

32.6%

58.7%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 10. Opportunity for meaningful interaction with faculty in research or other scholarly activity

M E Admin & Supervision

0.0%

0.0%

21.7%

28.3%

50.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 13. Quality of instruction regarding standards and ethics in your major field

M E Admin & Supervision

0.0%

2.2%

4.3%

23.9%

69.6%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 16. Use of appropriate technology in the classroom

M E Admin & Supervision

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

32.6%

67.4%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 23. “Real-world” experiences, exposure, examples, etc., in or out of the classroom

M E Admin & Supervision

0.0%

0.0%

4.3%

19.6%

76.1%

           

 

Department of Teaching & Learning, 2004-2005

Degree

1

2

3

4

5

Item 3.  Effectiveness of the faculty as teachers

BA Elem. Educ

1.2%

1.2%

17.1%

48.8%

31.7%

BA Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

51.6%

12.9%

M.Ed. C & I

0.0%

0.0%

6.1%

42.4%

51.5%

M.Ed  Sped Educ

0.0%

0.0%

20.0%

20.0%

60.0%

MAT Elem & SpEd

3.8%

3.8%

38.5%

38.5%

15.4%

MAT Sec Ed

6.2%

0.0%

18.8%

50.0%

25.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 7. Quality of instruction in advanced courses

BA Elem. Educ

1.2%

1.2%

9.8%

36.6%

51.2%

BA Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

50.0%

50.0%

M.Ed. C & I

0.0%

0.0%

3.0%

39.4%

57.6%

M.Ed. Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

53.3%

46.7%

MAT Elem & SpEd

3.8%

11.5%

15.4%

38.5%

30.8%

MAT Sec Ed

0.0%

6.2%

6.2%

31.2%

56.2%

 

Item 10. Opportunity for meaningful interaction with faculty in research or other scholarly activity

BA Elem. Educ

1.2%

7.3%

32.9%

29.3%

29.3%

BA Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

20.0%

20.0%

60.0%

M.Ed. C & I

3.0%

0.0%

9.1%

39.4%

57.6%

M.Ed. Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

33.3%

26.7%

40.0%

MAT Elem & SpEd

11.5%

11.5%

23.1%

34.6%

19.2%

MAT Sec Ed

0.0%

0.0%

37.5%

31.2%

31.2%

 

Item 13. Quality of instruction regarding standards and ethics in your major field

BA Elem. Educ

1.2%

1.2%

13.4%

42.7%

41.5%

BA Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

40.0%

60%

M.Ed. C & I

3.0%

0.0%

3.0%

39.4%

54.5%

M.Ed. Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

6.7%

33.3%

60.0%

MAT Elem & SpEd

0.0%

11.5%

15.4%

34.6%

38.5%

MAT Sec Ed

0.0%

6.2%

6.2%

37.5%

50.0%

 

Item 16. Use of appropriate technology in the classroom

BA Elem. Educ

1.2%

4.9%

13.4%

37.8%

42.7%

BA Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

20.0%

20.0%

60.0%

M.Ed. C & I

0.0%

0.0%

6.1%

27.3%

66.7%

M.Ed. Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

38.5%

57.7%

MAT Elem & SpEd

3.8%

0.0%

0.0%

38.5%

57.7%

MAT Sec Ed

0.0%

0.0%

25.0%

18.8%

56.2%

 

Item 23. “Real-world” experiences, exposure, examples, etc., in or out of the classroom

BA Elem. Educ

0.0%

3.7%

7.3%

30.5%

58.5%

BA Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

20.0%

80.0%

M.Ed. C & I

3.0%

0.0%

0.0%

27.3%

69.7%

M.Ed. Spec Educ

0.0%

6.7%

20.0%

20.0%

53.3%

MAT Elem & SpEd

0.0%

0.0%

11.5%

38.5%

50.0%

MAT Sec Ed

0.0%

6.2%

18.8%

25.0%

50.0%

 


 

Department of Educational Leadership, 2005-2006

Degree

 

1

2

3

4

5

Item 3. Effectiveness of the faculty as teachers

M E Admin & Supervision

0.0%

0.0%

3.2%

21.0%

75.8%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 7. Quality of instruction in advanced courses

M E Admin & Supervision

0.0%

0.0%

6.5%

30.6%

62.9%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 10. Opportunity for meaningful interaction with faculty in research or other scholarly activity

M E Admin & Supervision

0.0%

4.8%

17.7%

33.9%

43.5%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 13. Quality of instruction regarding standards and ethics in your major field

M E Admin & Supervision

0.0%

0.0%

3.2%

22.6%

74.2%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 16. Use of appropriate technology in the classroom

M E Admin & Supervision

0.0%

0.0%

3.2%

19.4%

77.4%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 23. “Real-world” experiences, exposure, examples, etc., in or out of the classroom

M E Admin & Supervision

0.0%

1.6%

6.5%

29.0%

62.9%

 

 

Department of Teaching & Learning, 2005-2006

Degree

1

2

3

4

5

Item 3. Effectiveness of the faculty as teachers

BA Elem. Educ

0.0%

1.1%

10.5%

47.4%

41.1%

BA Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

18.8%

37.5%

43.8%

M.Ed. C & I

0.0%

3.7%

11.1%

33.3%

51.9%

M.Ed  Sped Educ

0.0%

0.0%

8.7%

34.8%

56.5%

MAT Elem & SpEd

3.4%

0.0%

17.2%

41.4%

37.9%

MAT Sec Ed

0.0%

0.0%

9.1%

59.1%

31.8%

 

Item 7. Quality of instruction in advanced courses

 

BA Elem. Educ

1.1%

1.1%

4.2%

33.7%

60.0%

BA Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

12.5%

31.2%

56.2%

M.Ed. C & I

0.0%

3.7%

3.7%

33.3%

59.3%

M.Ed. Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

13.0%

26.1%

60.9%

MAT Elem & SpEd

3.4%

3.4%

20.7%

41.4%

31.0%

MAT Sec Ed

0.0%

0.0%

9.1%

27.3%

63.6%

 

Item 10. Opportunity for meaningful interaction with faculty in research or other scholarly activity

BA Elem. Educ

2.1%

3.2%

25.3%

42.1%

27.4%

BA Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

37.5%

31.2%

31.2%

M.Ed. C & I

7.4%

0.0%

14.8%

14.8%

63.0%

M.Ed. Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

26.1%

39.1%

34.8%

MAT Elem & SpEd

3.4%

13.8%

13.8%

31.0%

37.9%

MAT Sec Ed

4.5%

9.1%

36.4%

18.2%

31.8%

 

Item 13. Quality of instruction regarding standards and ethics in your major field

BA Elem. Educ

1.1%

0.0%

10.5%

27.4%

61.1%

BA Spec Educ

6.2%

0.0%

6.2%

25.0%

62.5%

M.Ed. C & I

0.0%

0.0%

11.1%

22.2%

66.7%

M.Ed. Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

4.3%

39.1%

56.5%

MAT Elem & SpEd

3.4%

3.4%

10.3%

20.7%

62.1%

MAT Sec Ed

0.0%

0.0%

13.6%

18.2%

68.2%

 

Item 16. Use of appropriate technology in the classroom

BA Elem. Educ

1.1%

1.1%

7.4%

32.6%

57.9%

BA Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

6.2%

12.5%

81.2%

M.Ed. C & I

0.0%

0.0%

7.4%

11.1%

81.5%

M.Ed. Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

4.3%

26.1%

69.6%

MAT Elem & SpEd

0.0%

3.4%

6.9%

34.5%

55.2%

MAT Sec Ed

0.0%

0.0%

9.1%

22.7%

68.2%

 

Item 23. “Real-world” experiences, exposure, examples, etc., in or out of the classroom

BA Elem. Educ

1.1%

0.0%

5.3%

14.7%

78.9%

BA Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

6.2%

37.5%

56.2%

M.Ed. C & I

0.0%

0.0%

11.1%

22.2%

66.7%

M.Ed. Spec Educ

0.0%

4.3%

4.3%

30.4%

60.9%

MAT Elem & SpEd

3.4%

3.4%

3.4%

24.1%

65.5%

MAT Sec Ed

0.0%

0.0%

9.1%

31.8%

59.1%

  

Department of Educational Leadership, 2006-2007

Degree

 

1

2

3

4

5

Item 3. Effectiveness of the faculty as teachers

ME Admin/Sup Supervision

0.0%

1.9%

1.9%

52.8%

43.4%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 7. Quality of instruction in advanced courses

M E Admin & Supervision

0.0%

1.9%

9.4%

37.7%

50.9%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 10. Opportunity for meaningful interaction with faculty in research or other scholarly activity

M E Admin & Supervision

1.9%

7.5%

15.1%

28.3%

47.2%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 13. Quality of instruction regarding standards and ethics in your major field

M E Admin & Supervision

0.0%

1.9%

3.8%

28.3%

66.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 16. Use of appropriate technology in the classroom

M E Admin & Supervision

0.0%

0.0%

7.5%

28.3%

64.2%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 23. “Real-world” experiences, exposure, examples, etc., in or out of the classroom

M E Admin & Supervision

1.9%

3.8%

13.2%

28.3%

52.8%

           

 

Department of Teaching & Learning, 2006-2007

Degree

1

2

3

4

5

Item 3.  Effectiveness of the faculty as teachers

BA Elem. Educ

0.0%

1.6%

17.5%

42.9%

38.1%

BA Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

42.9%

57.1%

M.Ed. C & I

0.0%

0.0%

5.0%

47.5%

47.5%

M.Ed  Sped Educ

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

29.4%

70.6%

MAT Elem & SpEd

2.9%

5.7%

31.4%

37.1%

22.9%

MAT Sec Ed

0.0%

9.5%

4.8%

47.6%

38.1%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 7. Quality of instruction in advanced courses

BA Elem. Educ

0.0%

0.0%

9.5%

39.7%

50.8%

BA Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

21.4%

78.6%

M.Ed. C & I

0.0%

0.0%

12.5%

25.0%

62.5%

M.Ed. Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

47.1%

52.9%

MAT Elem & SpEd

5.7%

2.9%

28.6%

40.0%

22.9%

MAT Sec Ed

0.0%

9.5%

4.8%

42.9%

42.9%

 

Item 10. Opportunity for meaningful interaction with faculty in research or other scholarly activity

BA Elem. Educ

0.0%

6.3%

17.5%

42.9%

33.3%

BA Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

14.3%

35.7%

50.%

M.Ed. C & I

0.0%

0.0%

22.5%

27.5%

50.0%

M.Ed. Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

17.6%

29.4%

52.9%

MAT Elem & SpEd

5.7%

2.9%

34.3%

45.7%

11.4%

MAT Sec Ed

4.8%

9.5%

19.0%

33.3%

33.3%

 

Item 13. Quality of instruction regarding standards and ethics in your major field

BA Elem. Educ

0.0%

1.6%

12.7%

34.9%

50.8%

BA Spec Educ

0.0%

7.1%

0.0%

35.7%

57.1%

M.Ed. C & I

0.0%

0.0%

7.5%

20.0%

72.5%

M.Ed. Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

17.6%

82.4%

MAT Elem & SpEd

2.9%

0.0%

25.7%

42.9%

28.6%

MAT Sec Ed

0.0%

0.0%

9.5%

42.9%

47.6%

 

Item 16. Use of appropriate technology in the classroom

BA Elem. Educ

0.0%

1.6%

15.9%

28.6%

50.8%

BA Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

7.1%

35.7%

57.1%

M.Ed. C & I

0.0%

0.0%

12.5%

25.0%

62.5%

M.Ed. Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

5.9%

29.4%

64.7%

MAT Elem & SpEd

5.7%

0.0%

22.9%

31.4%

40.0%

MAT Sec Ed

0.0%

0.0%

19.0%

38.1%

42.9%

 

Item 23. “Real-world” experiences, exposure, examples, etc., in or out of the classroom

BA Elem. Educ

0.0%

1.6%

6.3%

22.2%

69.8%

BA Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

28.6%

71.4%

M.Ed. C & I

0.0%

0.0%

15.0%

17.5%

67.5%

M.Ed. Spec Educ

0.0%

0.0%

5.9%

29.4%

64.7%

MAT Elem & SpEd

0.0%

0.0%

14.3%

42.9%

42.9%

MAT Sec Ed

0.0%

0.0%

14.3%

28.6%

57.1%

 

 

  

 


Southeastern Louisiana University
© 2007 Southeastern Louisiana University
All Rights Reserved
Unofficial and external sites are not endorsed by Southeastern Louisiana University